 |
|
The Good Shepherd (2006):
This is Robert DeNiro's epic-length fictionalization of the formation of
the CIA.
That's a difficult subject to tackle. The intrinsic nature of the CIA
means that its public history is filled with disinformation, and that portions
of the history, perhaps large portions, have never become public at all. Even
the portions which are known are confusing. Years after Glasnost, with
many of the old KGB files now available to scholars, there is still
considerable debate, for example, about whether certain Russian defectors were
actually planted by the KGB. The screenwriter's solution to the story's inherent uncertainties was to
fictionalize the story, consolidating some characters and creating others from
whole cloth, while offering a slightly different spin on some events. The
resultant project is a strange blend of reality and fiction, with the viewer
left in the dark about which is which.
The Bay of Pigs fiasco, for example, is given a completely fictional
overlay. According to the version, the Cubans knew about the invasion plans
because one of the CIA's bureau chiefs (counter-intelligence) had a discussion
which could be overheard by his son, and the son's girlfriend was actually a
KGB mole. As far as I know, none of that has any basis in fact, although there
does appear to have been a American leak, and the KGB did warn Castro in
advance of the imminent invasion. In reality, it was a completely different
branch of CIA which was involved in the invasion, not counter-intel, and three
senior CIA officers were forced to resign, including the director of
intelligence, Allen Dulles, and the director of plans, Richard Bissell.
On the other hand, the famous case of
Golitsyn and
Nosenko has been re-tooled to make it more cinematic. In real life, they were
two former KGB officers who offered contradictory information to the CIA.
Golitsyn claimed that he was a defector while Nosenko was a KGB plant
pretending to be a defector. Nosenko claimed it was the other way around. The
fictional version in The Good Shepherd changed the story in two fundamental
ways. First, the two Russians were both claiming to be the same guy! Second,
the CIA's director of counter-intelligence eventually found out that the one
he chose to believe had been the wrong one, and rectified his mistake. In
reality, the director of counter-intel continued to believe the wrong guy long
after his colleagues and the FBI had taken the opposite position.
Contrary to the film's portrayal, the "wrong guy" was never executed or
arrested, but lived in the West to a ripe old age and wrote two books about
his life in the intelligence game. He remained friends with the ousted
director of counter-intel who had believed him.
Other parts of the story are virtually non-fictional. The Matt Damon
character, the director of counter-intelligence, is primarily based on James
Jesus Angleton, the same fascinating figure who formed the core of Norman
Mailer's fictional "Harlot." The first half of the movie is virtually a
biographical account of Angleton's involvement in WW2, the OSS (CIA's
predecessor), and the creation of the CIA. Like the Damon character, Angleton
did graduate from Yale, where he was the editor of the poetry review, and he
did go on to be trained in intelligence by the British agent Kim Philby, who
later turned out to be a KGB agent. (He was the famous "third man.") Like the
Damon character, Angleton was known to the Soviets as "Mother," and was known
to be an abstemious workaholic and insomniac. The screenwriter has also
chosen, presumably for reasons of economy, to incorporate elements of
other CIA officers into the Damon character, so there is not a direct
one-to-one correspondence between Angleton and "Edward Wilson." In fact,
Angleton's career
was not profoundly affected by the Bay of Pigs invasion. Unlike several other
senior CIA officials, he was a survivor of that incident, and his power base
may even have benefited from the elimination of his most powerful rivals.
Angleton was finally undone by his Nixon-era use of the CIA to spy on student
activists and other anti-war figures, which was done in direct violation of a
CIA charter which forbids the domestic surveillance of American citizens.
Angleton, like Nixon himself, suspected that the anti-war movement was
actually being manipulated by KGB.
Now that I think about it, somebody should write a mini-series about the
real Angleton. (There's no way one could cover the subject in a single film.)
His life and his perceptions between 1940 and 1975 offer an unique spin on
America in that period. By the time he was forced out, the paranoid Angleton had
burned just about every possible bridge by accusing several prominent North
Americans of being manipulated by the KGB, including Gerald Ford, Henry
Kissinger, and Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau! But the Good Shepherd is not
that story.
Since the Good Shepherd story is not the absolute truth, and in any case
many parts of the truth are still unknown to us, we cannot evaluate it as the history of CIA, even though the film seems to take itself
seriously enough to invite such an interpretation. A more appropriate approach
would be to draw a parallel between this film and The Godfather. The Good
Shepherd is as accurate an account of the formation of the CIA as The
Godfather is of the formation of the modern crime syndicates.
We therefore have to measure the film's value as entertainment. In that
respect, it fails in many respects. First of all, the film has no characters
we can identify with. The Matt Damon character, who is on screen almost
continuously, is neither entertaining nor likeable. He is a man of few words
and fewer facial expressions. (One, to be exact.) His intentions are good, but
he is a calculating man and totally devoid of warmth. Once he graduates from
Yale, he has no friends, tells no jokes, spouts no interesting words. His
entire life consists of CIA business and he has virtually abandoned his
family.
And he's the most likeable character.
His story is made even more aloof by the fact that director Robert DeNiro
has chosen not to age the character in any significant way. Damon looks almost
exactly the same in the earliest and latest scenes. At one point there is a
transition where his son goes instantly from five-year-old to college senior,
but Damon looks exactly the same in both time periods. Maybe he changed his
glasses. This is actually quite confusing since the film jumps back and forth
between some two decades of history and we can't anchor ourselves by noting
Damon's appearance.
Lacking identification with a character, we look for some involvement in
the story, but the structure is not very compelling. The film begins with some
post-analysis of the leaks in the Bay of Pigs planning, and the entire story
is driven by the search for the mysterious source of the leak, as well as a
look at the techniques used by the analysts to pinpoint that source. I suppose
that means I've already spoiled the film for you above, but practically
speaking you will not be held spellbound by the solution to this mystery. At
the beginning of the film I guessed wrong at the source of the leak, but by
the time the revelation is finally made, the surprise has been totally
spoiled. In fact, we "get it" faster than the Damon character, although we do
not fully understand everyone's motivations.
So the film is not historical, the storyline is not especially compelling,
the timelines are somewhat confusing because of the aging factor, and the main
character is totally devoid of personality. Not much of a recommendation, is
it? And yet the film holds a certain fascination, and I finished with an ambivalence toward The Good Shepherd. I found it to be
overlong and sometimes boring, and I hated the non-ending. And yet the film's
gravitas managed to persuade me that I should pay attention to it for my own
good. In certain respects, the film seems to give us a great
deal of insight into how the counter-intel battle worked between KGB and CIA,
and that was quite an intriguing chess game. Chess is not much of a spectator
sport, but the film's presentation of the match has elegance, heft, and a
subtlety to it that commands our attention and respect, as if we were
listening to the war stories of a soldier who had thrown himself in the way of
a bullet to save our live.
Martina Gedeck
(collage) |
|
THIRD PARTY VIDEOS
-
An interesting look at Irene Jacob, then and now. She made The
Double Life of Veronique (zipped
.avi) in 1991, while in her miod-twenties, and The Education of Fairies (zipped
.avi) in 2006 at age 40. She's aged well. (Here's the
Movie House Commentary on
Double Life. Neither of us has seen the new film.)
OTHER CRAP:
Catch the deluxe version of Other Crap in real time, with all the bells and whistles, here.
MOVIE REVIEWS:
Yellow asterisk: funny (maybe). White asterisk: expanded format. Blue asterisk: not mine. No asterisk: it probably sucks.
|
|
 |
|
Cheatin' Hearts (1993)
I don't know what it is about me and IMDb genre choices
lately, but IMDb lists this as a western. While it takes place in New Mexico,
and the male lead wears a cowboy hat, it is decidedly not a western. This is
especially frustrating because I am not sure exactly what it is. I suppose
"drama" is general enough to cover it.
As the film opens, Jenny (Sally Kirkland) is told that her
mortgage has been turned down, and she will lose her family home the following
Monday. She has never lived anywhere else and the house was built by her
grandparents, but her husband (James Brolin), who has abandoned the family,
took out a mortgage to buy a garage in town. After he split, she couldn't
afford the payments. The timing is bad as well, as her younger daughter is
getting married. Sally hopes to see Brolin for the wedding, as does the
daughter. Their older daughter, who describes herself as the daughter from
hell, shows up from Julliard. About the only bright spot in Kirkland's world
is Kris Kristofferson, who is waiting patiently for her.
Daddy does arrive, but has his new girlfriend in tow,
safely hidden in a motel. Kirkland guesses correctly that he is after
something. Will Brolin's life and lies catch up with him? Will Kirkland lose
the house? Does Kristofferson have a chance?
Aha, this is a melodrama!
We have the evil banker waiving the deed and molesting the
poor heroine, Snidely Whiplash trying to defraud Kirkland as Nell one last
time for his own gain, and the foreclosure deadline playing the part of the
lumber mill. Will Dudley Doright (Kristofferson) arrive in time?
This film was released on video in Germany as Paper Hearts.
Cheatin' Hearts is the US incarnation of this direct to video. Or at least I
guess it went straight to video, since I see no evidence of a theatrical
release. In fact, it could easily have been a made for cable. It's a film that
looks good, and is full of likable characters, but somehow just did not add up
to a good film. I am not sure the script could have been made into a better
film, but a little more focus on humor or sex might have given it broader
appeal, and Pamela Gidley as the older "daughter from hell" deserved much more
exposure as the girl conflicted by her love for a local and her desire to
escape what she considers a dead end life. As it was made, Cheatin Hearts
languishes in no man's land with a G look about it and a PG script, but an R
for the nude scene.
D+.
IMDb readers say 4.2, and based on only 22 votes.
|
|
 |
|
 |
Dann reports on Factotum:
Based on a novel by Charles Bukowski about his own life experiences,
2005's Factotum is classified as a comedy, but unless you like laughing at
the self-imposed misfortunes of others, you'll probably consider this
stark and bleak look at the life of drunks as a drama, and a sad one at
that.
Hank Chinaski, a fictionalized version of the author, is himself a
self-professed author who rarely finishes anything but a bottle. He drifts
from meaningless job to meaningless job, and always gets fired either for
drinking on the job, or leaving in the middle of the day to drink. In his
mind, the only purpose for working is to buy booze.
Hank works his way through a myriad of women, also drunks usually met
in bars, and treats them with about as little respect as he treats his
jobs.
Totally depressing tale was saved by very good performances by Matt
Dillon, Lili Taylor, and Marisa Tomei. I enjoyed the performances, while I
appreciated but did not like the story. If you're in the mood to be
thoroughly depressed, watch this one.
For those interested in such matters, these are my 2000, 2001, and 2002
collages still in circulation (a few have been withdrawn over time on
request of the people in the collages).
 |
 |
 |
Lili Taylor |
Marisa Tomei |
Emily Hynnek |
|
|
|

Notes and collages
The Supernatural Ladies
Stephanie Menuez in The Rapture |

|
Mimi Rogers in The Rapture |

|
Carole Davis in The Rapture |

|
|
|
|
 |
Jessica Alba at the beach. Just
bikini shots, but she sure fills it out nicely.
|
 
|
Kristin Scott-Thomas in Chromophobia,
still getting her bra off at age 45
|
 
|
Penelope Cruz in Chromophobia (non
nudes)
|

|
Toni Collette in The Dead Girl
|

|
Mary Beth Hurt in The Dead Girl
|

|
A run of hi-def caps comin' up (not mine,
but definitely welcome)
First, Keira Knightley in Domino
|

|
Hi-def caps:
Lauren Lee Smith in Lie With Me,
voted one
of the year's best nude scenes
|
 
|
Hi-def caps:
Jessica Alba in Into the Blue
|

|
Hi-def caps:
Ashley Scott in Into the Blue
|

|
Hi-def caps:
Maria Bello in A History of Violence
|

|
Hi-def caps:
Lynn Chen in Saving Face
|

|
|
|
|
 |
|