American Psycho (2000)

Nothing to add. This is a pic I forgot yesterday.

Krista Sutton

The Amateur (1981)

One of the nicest things about the DVD revolution is that is has encouraged smaller publishers to acquire the rights to and release some forgotten films. A lot of those have been art films and grade-B efforts from the drive in and double feature eras, but every once in a while an old mainstream effort is pulled back from oblivion.

Such a film is The Amateur, which was considered a major project and earned some respect in its own day.

• A Canadian film, it was nominated for 10 Genies (the Canadian equivalent of Oscars), although it went home from the ceremony 0-for-10.
• The film stars an eclectic international cast. Canadian Christopher Plummer is one of the leads, but the star is John Savage. He may not seem like a big star to you today, but Savage had been elevated very close to the A-list by a good run in the late seventies with The Deer Hunter, Hair, and The Onion Field. People wanted to hire him in those days, although nobody seemed to have a very clear idea about which roles he was suited for.
• The director was Charles Jarrott, a British director who had come close to the A-list himself in the late sixties and early seventies with two Tudor dramas: Anne of the Thousand Days and Mary, Queen of Scots. His stock dropped somewhat after the famous uber-bomb Lost Horizon, but by the time he directed The Amateur in 1982, he was still considered a respected director. For that matter, he is still  directing, although nearly 80!
• The budget was about $10 million dollars, which was a healthy amount in 1982. It's up there on screen, too. There are some outstanding location shots in Vienna and the surrounding area, and there are a couple of expensive looking set pieces.

So what happened over the years to doom this film to obscurity? Well, John Savage did not go on to become a superstar, as you know, so there was no interest generated there. And the film is one of those Cold War espionage films which now seem so very dated. The film wasn't topical enough or good enough to remember for the right reasons, nor was it bad enough to remember for the wrong reasons.

The premise of the film sounds a lot like Gorky Park. A solitary American goes behind the Iron Curtain on a mission of personal revenge, and is assisted by a smart, honest Eastern European cop. The similarity between the two films ends at the set-up level however. The Amateur is told from the American's point of view, not the local cop's, and the American is not a tough guy who speaks the local language, but a wimpy mathematician who seems to think he can just slip into Soviet-controlled territory and knock off three hardened terrorists.

The terrorists in question murdered the genius's girlfriend when she was working on a photographic assignment in Munich (played by Vienna).  It was one of those ugly deals where the terrorists were going to kill one hostage every fifteen minutes until they got their way, and she came up first in the rotation. He works for the CIA as a cipher expert, encoding and decoding various messages, and goes to his bosses for assistance. They say they can do nothing, so he devises a plan in which every secret in the history of the CIA will be revealed to the press unless they let him go into the Eastern Bloc and take out the terrorists. After having read the last sentence, you don't think his plan is plausible, and you realize that he wouldn't have a prayer. The CIA bigwigs have the same reaction, but since they have no choice, they send him for agent training in order to buy enough time to figure out how he has rigged the system.

Once he gets into Czechoslovakia, the CIA manages to foil his blackmail scheme, at which time they decide to send more CIA men to Prague (again played by Vienna, only this time with the German signs papered over), but to kill our hero, not to help him. Therefore, the terrorists, the communists, and the CIA are all using professional killers to try to kill him, and he is just "the amateur." He seems to be doomed, but he gets a break. A scholarly local policeman (Christopher Plummer) takes an interest in this whole business of CIA agents shooting at other CIA agents, and wonders why. When he finally figures out the whole scenario, he ends up wanting to help our nerdy hero. Why is the Czech so eager to help our hero, and why is the CIA so eager to kill him? That is the mystery which forms the real core of the plot.

I liked this film, although it really has a lot of problems. In fact, I can't imagine how it was ever nominated for awards. Some of the plot elements are just absurd.

1. When the head terrorist comes out of the building to kill his first hostage, he stands on the sidewalk and shoots her in the head, then calmly walks several yards back into the building without a shield of any kind. Hundreds of sharpshooters are focused on him, and he is unprotected, but they do nothing.

2.  When Savage is working at his desk, the film painstakingly demonstrates that he needs to wear his glasses. When Savage is in training to be an agent, the film painstakingly establishes that he is the world's worst marksman. Yet when he comes face-to-face with the terrorist, he is able to kill him with one very difficult perfect shot, and he is not even wearing his glasses at the time!

3. Savage makes his way into Czechoslovakia on foot. He has to walk miles and miles in the snow, on difficult hilly terrain, even sleeping overnight in the process. He knew this was coming, yet he had slipped over the border wearing only a short leather jacket, and he never even buttoned it up! He must really be style-conscious. Not to mention weather-resistant.

4. Speaking of that leather jacket, nobody in Prague seems to think it looks out of place in the freezing winter climes, despite the fact that (a) it is inappropriate for the weather; and (b) it's the only expensive leather jacket in all of Czechoslovakia.

5. There are several instances where Savage tracks someone down in completely improbable ways that make no sense either at the time or upon later reflection.

6. All important CIA guys are always within six feet of the director when news of Savage comes back to them. One time this happens in the director's office in the middle of the night, one time it happens while they are attending a gala. This must be a subset of the basic cheesy film rule which states that any movie character who turns on a TV will immediately see a news story that affects him personally.

7. The high level Czech policeman played by Plummer (who is also a professor) delegates no authority at all. When the CIA and the Czechs are doing surveillance and counter-surveillance in the middle of the night, staking out an apartment where Savage is thought to be taking refuge, ol' Christopher Plummer is there personally, sitting in one of what seems to be a fleet of cars parked outside that apartment building. Do they burst into the apartment to do something important? No, it's just routine surveillance. No matter where Savage's traile leads

Despite all these mystifying lapses in common sense and logic, I got drawn into the mysteries and counter-mysteries, I found the resolution reasonably satisfying, and I really enjoyed the European locales, including the poor sections of Prague (Vienna), and some small towns which time has forgotten. There is also a great set-piece which involves a shoot-out in a warehouse filled with mirrors and chandeliers.

Plusses and minuses.

It's a film which has been forgotten and I suppose you can leave it forgotten if you aren't into the cold war espionage genre. If you do like those films, however, this is a pretty decent one that you have probably not seen, and which you have certainly not seen at this level of quality, because is now available in an excellent widescreen anamorphic DVD produced by Anchor Bay. There are no features, but they did a great job at re-mastering and transferring the film itself.

Chapelle Jaffe

In a previous incarnation, when I really did scan afew things, my favorite subjects were Brazilian women. Great figures, beautiful cabooses, all natural bods...I miss those days. I have since evolved...some would say mutated...into a capper of obscure movies and things like that. But when my eyes fell upon the title "Emmanuelle in Rio" I could not resist. Instead of scanning them, I could cap Brazilian women and all the world would be a better place for it. Sure enough this edition of the Emmanuelle tradition has her employed as photographer in Rio, commissioned to hire a bunch of gals for a music video. And what you get is Emmanuelle and five other women doing the triple B bosa nova. We are talking full frontals and long, lingering close-ups of some righteous looking fannies. Some near gynocam shots, too. So what if the plot blows chunks? This is not Godfather part IV for heaven's sake; it's an Emmanuelle movie.

A few notes.

Ludmilla Ferraz plays Emmanuelle. She is the only one credited in the disk I rented but CNdb identified the other women, most likely from the TV show that went into the making of this movie. If you trust the kind soul who posted the review to that site... and i do...then the labels on these collages are correct. Ludmilla does not take off her clothes very often in the movie, but her sport-humpin' scene shows us just about every square inch of her surface (collage 3 is the most revealing).

Ludmilla Ferraz

Juliana Batista plays Emmanuelle's sister, who Emmanuelle refers to as a slut. Imagine that. How many guys do you have to pork for Emmanuelle to call you a slut? Reminds me of a saying I used to hear in the Republic of Texas-- it's like being called ugly by a frog.

Juliana Batista

The only robo-hooters are sported by Simone de Morais; and as luck would have it, Simone is in a half-dozen butt-naked scenes, and her butt, naked, is wonderful. So I grabbed a bunch of frames and picked out the best.

Simone de Morais

All the gals except Emmanuelle are in this weird-ass scene where some floridly gay guy helps undress them as Emm looks them over. This includes Simone, who she just finished photographing the hell out of, and her frickin's sister. WTF? She has to inspect her sister because she doesn't what she looks like??!! And since all the gals she inspects wind up in the video the only purpose for the scene was a noble one indeed--to give us the best possible view of their cabooses.

Some camera views were easy to cap but a whole bunch had extreme movement chatter, making them impossible to deal with. Too bad, since it limited the number of frames I grabbed to about 2000.

Deena Casiano

Janaina Lima

Tatiana de Souza

Anyway, there ya go. This is a movie with a bunch of women who may not have a face to match CZJ but each of whom has a way better body. Way better. i approve.

Today we return to "Shadows Run Black".

Here's a whole bunch of caps of Barbara Peckinpaugh from this would be slasher flick which really focused on getting as many women naked as they could (not a bad thing). Barbara had no problem with that as she gives us all three B's. Of course she also made adult films using the name Barbara Britton so this would have been a piece of cake for her.

Barbara Peckinpaugh

Then we have a "Babe in Bondage", Elizabeth Trosper tied up and gagged while wearing only a night gown. Why is it that so many times the top billed female is the only one that doesn't get naked in these films?

Elizabeth Trosper

We wrap it up with Rochelle Brodley showing tits only. I guess she had some modesty.

Rochelle Brodley

MOVIE REVIEWS:

Here are the latest movie reviews available at scoopy.com.

• The yellow asterisks indicate that I wrote the review, and am deluded into thinking it includes humor.
• If there is a white asterisk, it means that there isn't any significant humor, but I inexplicably determined there might be something else of interest.
• A blue asterisk indicates the review is written by Tuna (or Junior or Brainscan, or somebody else besides me)
• If there is no asterisk, I wrote it, but am too ashamed to admit it.

Other Crap archives. May also include newer material than the links above, since it's sorta in real time.

Click here to submit a URL for Other Crap

Currently on disability. If you'd like to get in touch with him, his email address is tuna@scoopy.com

If you have your own site or blog, sign up today and earn some extra cash in 2005 by promoting the Fun House!